View Article  I Clement 33-44

Clement refers to sacrifices being made by the high priest in Jerusalem. This is unequivocally in the present tense; yet it is known that temple sacrifices ceased, once and for all, when the Roman occupied the Temple in 70CE. On the face of it, then it would appear that I Clement was written before 70 CE, some 25 years earlier than the usual date assumed for Clement's installation as Bishop of Rome.

We discussed some possibilities:

That there is a scribal error, and that the original is in a different tense

That Clement is quoting from some earlier document.

That sacrifices were made after 70 AD.

Dr. Isobel Combes suspects that we are overstating the issue:

 

.... as I understand it, the conventional view dates Clement to around 95 AD. It may be simpler than you think -- he is still one of those who sees Christianity merely as a continuation of Judaism and Christians as "true Israelites" still following in the traditions of priests and synagogues. It will have taken some time, if ever, for it to sink in for some people that it was really all over.

If the Houses of Parliament and St Paul's were razed to the ground and invading fundamentalists took over London, would we all shrug and say "ah well, the end of democracy and the Church of England" .... or would we still for years afterwards live in hope that the situation would eventually be sorted out and we would go back to the way things were?

Or, living elsewhere, occasionally even forget that it had happened and be caught out occasionally mentioning it as if it were still there?

View Article  I Clement 23-32

We reviewed the known history of the letter known as I Clement, and discussed why it has never been thought be pseudonymous.

We enjoyed Clement's description of the Phoenix cycle, and wondered where he got his information.

We puzzled over Clement's references to the resurrection and his insistence on this as a future event. Apparently, there was a section of the Christian Church that believed that the general resurrection had already occured. Colossians 2:12 can be read this way, but Paul appears to oppose that view in Romans 6:4-5 .

Clement quotes Deuteronomy 32: 8-9 as "When the Most High divided the nations....... he fixed the bounds of the nations according to the number of the angels of God." NRSV translates this as "he fixed the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the gods" -- which suggests a quixotic image -- "I'll take Israel, you, Baal, take Syria; Artemis, you can have Greece; Odin, take Germany........"

View Article  I Clement 12-23

Chapters 12-23 start with a discussion of humility citing Christ, the prophets, and David as examples. They segue into a plea for peace, citing the order and harmony of the universe.

We discussed the power relationship between the churches of Rome and Corinth, coming down between the view of the primacy of Rome and total independence, thinking more in terms of the older, more experienced church giving advice. Clement appears to have considerable resources at his disposal, as evinced by his fluent use of the Old Testament and quotations from Jesus, not quite in their canonical form. We posited the existence of a large "library" of texts at Rome.

View Article  Clement to Corinth 1-12

Clement to Corinth 1-12

There is argument as to whether Clement was a Pope, with authority over other churches, or just a leader of a particular church, asked to give an opinion on a issue at another.

He makes fluent use of Old and New Testaments, although the canon of scripture was not be established for a few hundred years.

There are interesting references to Paul and Peter, including a reference to Paul as having reached "the limits of the West" Since there is no reference to this in Acts, it may mean that Paul survived his first trial in Rome, and went on to visit Spain.

Clement's letter refers, apparently, to the expulsion of presbyters from the church at Corinth. It is unclear what the point was at issue. Clement takes the view that churchmembers should be loyal to their presbyters, even "approaching them on bended knee". Whatever view one takes of the extent of the authority vested in Clement, it does seem that the church is well on it way to having an authoritative clergy.

(We also looked at CS Lewis' poem "A Cliche Escapes From Its Cage" in reference to last week's item in the Washington Post about paganism.)

View Article  Revelation and Laodicea

Laodicea was a prosperous city, partly because of its successful trade in black wool, and partly from its geographical location, being on the intersection of two great highways, one from Smyrna and Ephesus, heading East through Syria to Persia, and the other running from the coast at Attalia to Pergamum. The location is not a natural one, and, in particular, the supply of water always involved problems. There was the hot spa water from Hieropolis, with its high sulfur content, and cold clear water from Colossae. Both were supplied to Laodicea, and one suspects that there was domestic cross-contamination, vividly described by John as water one would "spit out of his mouth". John uses this image to accuse Laodicea of being "neither hot nor cold".

Laodicea is the seventh and last of the churches addressed directly in Revelation.

Revelation then becomes apocalyptic, and we looked at the twelve ways of interpreting such literature listed by Wikipedia.

We shall continue with early Christian letters by reading correspondance from Clement of Rome to the church in Corinth.